This is a topic that is due and much
needed at this time. While I am in favor of nanotechnology for the
greater good that it can do, some issues could cause more harm than
intended. Kathleen Eggleson, a research scientist in the Center for
Nano Science and Technology (NDnano) at the University of Notre Dame,
provides an example of a nanotechnology-related safety and ethics
problem that is unfolding right now.
She realizes that nanotechnology is
here and there are some ethical and problematic sides to our new
found and potentially great tool for treatment of diseases. Not only
will they affect people in real ways, but nanotechnology may also
become a harm to people. This is why she is in charge of the Center
for Nano Science and Technology last year to study and prompt
discussion of problems involving nanotechnology.
"NDnano is expanding its scope
into studies of the societal impact of nanotechnology,"
explains Wolfgang Porod, Frank M. Freimann Professor of Electrical
Engineering at Notre Dame and director of the center. "This
is the background for bringing Kathy on board."
As part of her duties, she has
established a monthly meeting group, called Nano Impacts Intellectual
Community. This taps into Notre Dame researchers from the campus,
visiting scholars, and others from outside the university to probe
nanotechnology topics in depth. Some of the issues on the table have
been ethics in nanomedicine, the commercialization of nanotechnology
products, and the interdisciplinary nature of nanotechnology
research.
Eggleson has some excellent thoughts
about nanotechnology and its usage. She is concerned about how
nanotechnology may affect our own beneficial and internal bacteria
needed to synthesize vitamins and aid digestion. Some bacteria are
needed to maintain appropriate levels of nitrogen in the air.
She discusses at length a potential
good and potential harm from one use of nanotechnology. This is the
nano-sized particles of silver that are used in hospitals and
clinics. Silver is an element that is known for its antimicrobial
properties. These nano-sized particles are being applied to hard
surfaces, like bed rails and doorknobs, and to fabrics, such as
sheets, gowns and curtains, by a growing number of medical supply
companies. These new materials are proving effective.
"Nanosilver coatings have made
life-saving differences to the properties of typical hospital items,"
Eggleson says. "Just this last December, a textile made by a
Swiss company was the first nano-scale material approved as a
pesticide by the EPA."
“The possible new danger is that the vast majority of bacteria and other microorganisms are actually neutral, or even beneficial, to human life and a healthy environment. So overuse of nanosilver products, especially outside of clinical environments, could pose a danger to needed microorganisms, and enable resistant strains to flourish.”
"Under most conditions, the preservation of microbial biodiversity is a benefit," explains Eggleson. "In fact, those who would use these potent new antimicrobial technologies for frivolous uses, such as for odor control, work directly against the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative's goal of responsible nanotechnology development."
This is the purpose for Kathleen
Eggleson and I do not envy her and the tasks she has ahead of her.
Read the article here.
No comments:
Post a Comment