In part 1 of this blog, I discussed
much of the importance of diabetes self-management education (DSME)
and mentioned diabetes self-management training (DSMT) in mainly the
context of use by certified diabetes educators. The article from
this link provides much information. There are a few more points to
be discussed and emphasized before I discuss more about peer mentors
and peer-to-peer workers using this (DSME) to supplement
self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).
The topics of depression, physical
disability, personal preferences, and quality of life were mentioned
and need more emphasis. It is also important to consider
hypoglycemia, life expectancy, and the incorporation of other
professionals in the care of the elderly. These topics are important
for professionals and need to be learned by peer mentors and
peer-to-peer workers.
Mild depression for people with type 2
diabetes is about two-thirds of them and less than one-fifth may have
severe depression. The article states that the rate of depression in
patients is at least two times higher than the general population.
It then continues to say the risk of an older person with diabetes
experiencing a major depressive episode is 1.6 times higher. I think
they mean the general population, but this is not said. The key of
why this is important is this statement “Functional
disability (difficulties performing activities of daily living and
social activities) is significantly increased in the presence of both
diabetes and depression, and it negatively affects self-care.”
Therefore, screening for depression in the elder
population is necessary. If depression if suspected, the depression
needs to be resolved before any changes are made to the diabetes
self-management plan.
In the previous blog, recent illness or
an operation were mentioned, but physical disabilities also needs to
be evaluated. The people over the age of 60 may have other physical
limitations in performing the activities of daily living (eating,
dressing, and toileting). They may also have problems in other areas
of daily living such as using the telephone, preparing meals,
traveling, and managing finances. Additionally, older adults are at
higher risk of hearing loss, vision problems, decreased mobility,
falls, fear of falls, and chronic pain.
Patients who are experiencing
difficulties with daily tasks will need mandatory individual rather
than group DSME. Treatment regimens will need to be relatively
simple rather than normal or complex regimens. Learning new skills
will take longer and may require referral to a visiting nurse to make
sure the task is fully integrated into the patient's self-care
regimen. A check back program to evaluate the learning progress may
be necessary as well. A physical therapy or local elder services
referral may be needed to assess the home environment and prevent
potential injury from falls or accidents.
In elderly patients with type 2
diabetes, it is very important to find out what the personal
preferences are with respect to care. It is well known that when
patients' preferences can be incorporated into care plans, adherence
increases, patient satisfaction increases, and the likelihood of
improved patient outcomes goes up. Some patients will not need
adjustments to their treatment plan, but others with physical or
cognitive challenges, may need many adaptive changes.
For the elder type 2 diabetes patients,
concern for hypoglycemia is a must if they are on insulin or a
combination of oral medications and sulfonylurea is among the
combinations. The elderly are more likely to be vulnerable with
hypoglycemia occurring at lower blood glucose levels, be harder to
recognize, and have poorer outcomes. In the elderly, hypoglycemia
may show up in terms of neuroglycopenic symptoms like dizziness,
weakness, confusion, and even delirium. This is unlike the symptoms
of the younger generations called adrenergic such as tachycardia,
palpitation, and sweating. In the elderly, hypoglycemia may
aggravate common diseases such as coronary artery disease and
cerebrovascular disease. The frail elderly may have outcomes such as
injurious falls, even with mild hypoglycemia.
Taking the two diseases mentioned in
the last paragraph and adding the two other pathological conditions
of hypertension and dyslipidemia to the list and these often dominate
the overall health of older patients. Functional status of older
people with type 2 diabetes and cognitive decline changes the focus
of care treatments from optimizing goals for diabetes to optimizing
function and quality of life. The best treatment goals then become
achieving the best possible glycemic management allowable, while
maintaining independence and optimizing quality of life.
Factoring in that for some elderly with
type 2 diabetes, life expectancy may be shorter than the time needed
to obtain benefits from an intervention. Before recommending or
implementing complicated, costly, or uncomfortable treatment regimens
that may result in harmful side effects, it is necessary to realize
that there will be reduced adherence to recommended therapies, and
reduced general well-being. In other words, the time frame needed to
realize benefits should be carefully considered relative to life
expectancy.
Two other areas for discussion must
include the use of multiple disciplines and care partners in the
treatment of the elderly diabetes population. Because older patients
with diabetes are clinically and functionally even more diverse than
their younger counterparts, therefore they have even greater need for
the services of specialists, including nurses, dietitians, exercise
physiologists, behavioral medicine specialists, social workers,
pharmacists, and rehabilitation professionals.
In chronic diseases such as diabetes,
day-to-day care responsibilities fall mostly on patients. However,
when patients are unable to assume full responsibility for their
self-care, family members, friends, or other care partners may need
to be involved. In older adults in particular, care partners can play
a critical role in managing chronic illness, tipping the balance
toward effective rather than failed self-care. If needed, family
members or other caregivers should be included in DSME.
Because of the shortage of certified
diabetes educators and even the absence of in many rural areas, this
is an opportunity for peer mentors, and peer-to-peer workers to fill
a need. For the ages about 60, the educators seem to vacate their
responsibility and this creates a vacuum that needs filling. This is
a reason to become educated in this area and work with the
professionals that do care about the health status of the elderly.
They, in my limited experience, are willing to share knowledge and
give some training.
It is necessary for us to learn what we
are able from these caring professional and undertake with their
guidance the task of using DSME to assist the elderly diabetes
patients. Communication is a must especially back to the doctor by
the peer mentor and peer-to-peer worker. Because of HIPAA rules,
unless a patient specifically asks the doctor to alert us of his/her
medical health conditions, our participation will be severely
limited.
Limitations aside, there are some
elderly patients being served by peer mentors and peer-to-peer
workers and the patients are sometimes filling in the information
needed. Never let the lack of information
completely stop you as a peer mentor or peer-to-peer worker as the
need for us is there and by learning about DSME and SMBG and other
care areas, we will be useful.
Build a network of specialists,
including nurses, dietitians or nutritionists, exercise
physiologists, behavioral medicine specialists, social workers,
pharmacists, and rehabilitation professionals, so that if the patient
you are working with is in need of their services, you are able to
recommend to the doctor, people that are available in that community.
The doctor is the only one able to make the determination call and
make the referral after evaluating your report and talking to the
patient or their caregiver.
Always make a report to the doctor each
time you visit a patient you are assigned and make the report as
detailed as possible. What you leave out, may make a difference, so
include any item even if you prioritize the list. This blog and the
previous blog lists many of the areas of concern; however, it is not
all-inclusive.