Is there a future for the American
Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE)? Not if the Academy of
Certified Diabetes Educators (ACDE) has anything to say about it. At
present they both have members that have taken the test given by the
National Certification Board for Diabetes Educators (NCBDE) and
passed it. The ACDE is taking the exclusive route and not allowing
honorary membership and is lobbying hard in some states to prohibit
anyone with knowledge of diabetes from passing this on to other
people with diabetes. This includes peer-to-peer diabetes workers,
peer diabetes mentors, diabetes coaches, and others.
The AADE does have honorary members and
does unofficially work with a few of the groups in the last sentence
above. And the AADE does not list all that have passed the NCBDE
examination as members. The about 13,000 members does become more
realistic when you consider those that have retired or are not doing
certified diabetes education work. Although neither organization is
particularly transparent in their actions, from my observations the
AADE is the more transparent of the two.
“•We should keep moving forward
with our public awareness campaign to increase media exposure
highlighting what we do for people with diabetes (PWD). Rather than
relying on a healthcare provider to recommend diabetes
self-management education and support (DSME/S), let PWD know about
what we do so they can ask for a referral (similar to what patients
do regarding medications after they read or hear about something
new).”
False advertising is not what they
should be doing. This is the aim of Big Pharma in their advertising
and the hypochondriacs answer the call. There has to be some reason
that healthcare providers stop referring diabetes patients to CDEs.
I know some doctors do not like the conflicts created by CDEs and
this is why many will no longer refer diabetes patients. In other
more rural areas, CDEs are just not available. When CDEs teach to
the lowest level, make mandates the rule and do little actual
education, then we must wonder if they have a purpose. Even many
studies find that peer-to-peer education produces better A1cs.
“•When considering the value
of diabetes education/educators, recognition should be given to what
we prevent including the onset of diabetes, complications from
diabetes, and costs (i.e., to prevent hospital admissions).”
Oh, if only this last could be true!
The CDEs generally do not work with people with pre-diabetes or
counsel them. Very few ever work with type 2 diabetes patients;
therefore, I have to wonder with so few CDEs, how can we depend on
these people to really fulfill the needs of so many. Most CDEs do
not properly assess persons with diabetes (PWD). For many it is a
one-size-fits-all or nothing. Many will not work with a PWD that
talks about depression and most avoid dealing with depression or
burnout. How can patients trust CDEs that avoid something like mild
depression.
“•Diabetes education should
be at the beginning of the algorithm for care of a person with
diabetes; not at the middle or end when problems could have already
occurred.”
The above is true, but there are not
enough CDEs to take this on. Most will not work with telemedicine or
groups of patients.
“•Diabetes educators are key
providers in chronic care; we should brand our profession to be
included in the chronic care model.”
Diabetes is a chronic illness, but with
the few CDEs, how can we depend on CDEs to fill this role. Mandates
do not work for people with diabetes and we need individual
treatment, not the one-size-fits-all treatment they dish out.
“•Diabetes educators need to be
armed with more knowledge on the business of diabetes to help us in
the current medical care environment (i.e., Patient-Centered Medical
Homes, Accountable Care Organizations, etc.).”
Many CDEs are learning that doctors are
excluding them from the new medical care environment because of their
attitudes.
“•We need to get legislators
on our side to push through legislation that will help us in our work
with PWD.”
This statement can be taken several
ways and is open for interpretation. We have one organization doing
this now and we don't need another organization trying to criminalize
people for helping others with diabetes.
“•Diabetes educators can
collaborate with more money-generating pieces of medical care so we
can give quality care to PWD in a team approach (rather than
struggling financially on our own and being considered a money-losing
part of care).”
They do have a lot to learn.
“•We should clarify the
levels of the diabetes educator so it is understood by us, healthcare
providers, and the public.”
What levels are they talking about?
The levels of mandates, maybe. Or those that run from people with
depression? Now if they have different levels of education and
training, maybe we should know this.
“•Many people with
prediabetes may not appreciate the importance of behavior change to
prevent the onset of type 2 diabetes. Perhaps prediabetes should be
renamed Stage 1 diabetes to increase the importance of the condition
and changes that can be made to prevent progression to DM (Stage 2
diabetes).”
This is one point I could support.
.
“•We should look for ways
to influence the prevention of type 2 diabetes, from children to
adults, with methods that can be accessed by all in need (including
those with socio-economic challenges).”
No comments.
“•Electronic medical records
give challenge and benefit. Diabetes educators should be at the
table during the creation of EMRs to improve ease of use and
beneficial data output.”
They are a way behind on this one.
EMRs have already been created and are being updated all the time.
“•There are not enough
diabetes educators to meet the needs of all PWD that could benefit
from DSME/S. We need to get the word out about diabetes education in
academic programs and to current healthcare providers that might be
interested in becoming diabetes educators. At the same time, we need
to increase the public’s knowledge of how we can help, increasing
referrals to prevent closing of programs (and back to the knowledge
about the business of DSME/S).”
The first sentence is correct, and the
rest is a pipe dream as some are interested until they find out about
the test and the qualifications needed.