Diabetes self-management education
(DSME) can easily be used in place of self-monitoring of blood
glucose (SMBG) to confuse the unknowing public. They both involve
education of the patient in management of blood glucose; however,
DSME is then taken a few steps further to expand the issue. Both are
equally valuable and can be used together. Many of us stop when
talking about SMBG at the end of managing blood glucose.
This is where we make the mistake and
do not carry the topic as far as DSME does. DSME continues on to
include the whole process of diabetes management and takes into
consideration the entire patient. For that reason, there has been
some separation legitimately in the titles. Sometimes certain groups
use the term DSMT (diabetes self-management training). It is a shame
that the group that developed this only uses it in writing and
self-promotion. This group seldom uses DSME or DSMT in actual
practice.
This article is about older adults, but
should apply across all ages with modifications. Older patients (age
60 and older) with diabetes do account for more than one-fifth of all
patients with diabetes. One statement made in the study that I may
repeat is this, and I quote, “Medical care
in the absence of adequate self-care is rarely effective for chronic
illnesses.” This is an important point and worth
emphasizing repeatedly.
DSME is the supposed goal of certified
diabetes educators. If they would follow and use it, we could all
benefit. Instead, they muddy it up with mantras and do not educate
many type 2 diabetes patients. This is their weakness and the
importance of DSME should not be diminished. DSME was originally
designed for all types of diabetes – again the one-size-fits-all;
however, I will be talking about type 2 diabetes for the older
generation in this blog and maybe for the younger generations in a
future blog.
DSME for those age 60 and older
requires, and I mean requires that it be on an individual
basis. There is no place for a one-size-fits-all application for the
elderly. Where possible it should involve care partners when
patients are not able to assume full responsibility for their own
self-care. DSME should also consider the potential effects of
diabetes treatments on quality of life, but at the same time,
encourage all individuals who want to achieve successful
health-related care.
Studies of self-management
interventions clearly indicate that health behaviors, health status,
and health care utilization improve with patient education in
diabetes daily care. If only Medicare would stop taking away testing
supplies, it might improve even more. One study compared patients
that had received some diabetes self-management education with
patients not receiving any DSME. Those not receiving any DSME had a
fourfold increased risk for major diabetes complications. This alone
points out the importance of diabetes education, and the more
education the better. This also explains the importance of follow up
reinforcement of what they have learned, and asking how they are
doing with what they have learned. Be specific and do not accept
brush-offs of the questions.
Now the one fault of DSME for the over
60 age group is they are very under-represented in DSME research
studies. Therefore, what we have is a set of expert consensus
formulated guidelines developed by the American Association of
Diabetes Educators (AADE) and the American Geriatric Society. This
also highlights the need for other groups that can step forward and
fill the need for those with type 2 diabetes. Since the AADE is
obviously ignoring the needs of the elderly, this opens opportunities
for peer mentors, and peer-to-peer people. With the increasing
number of people with type 2 diabetes, and the lack of growth in the
AADE, these people will assume roles that are even more important in
the near future.
First, we have discussed making sure
that the diabetes self-management education is created for the
individual and not a one-size-fits-all situation. This should
consider how long the individual has had type 2 diabetes. Next, a
determination needs to be made of existence of any complications,
other medical conditions, and life expectancy. Lastly, is the
individual limited in English proficiency, frail, or cognitively
impaired as these must be part of the education process and made part
of the care partner concerns.
Older adults should be carefully
evaluated do determine their knowledge of diabetes and their ability
to learn and apply new self-care skills. Social support,
transportation availability, financial problems, and functional
status must be assessed. Treatment goals and management skills may
need to be evaluated frequently to keep pace with changes in
functional and cognitive abilities, which can occur relatively
quickly.
For the elder generations, nutrition is
important. Be sure that the proper nutrition authority is in
attendance as problems with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics in
some states is now the only people that can give nutrition advice
unless you are certified by them. Nutrition education is important
and older adults must be evaluated to determine if there needs to be
changes and to what degree these changes will be followed.
When assessing elder patients'
understanding of diabetes and nutrition, a thorough assessment must
include individual food preferences, meal preparation capabilities,
and potential misunderstandings of adequate nutrition. This should
include, but not be limited to dental health, swallowing
difficulties, gastrointestinal complaints, decreased appetite,
decreased thirst, taste-altering medications, limited finances, and
social isolation. Because the diabetes patients are elderly, pushing
a fixed number of carbohydrates must be forbidden. Registered
dietitians that will not work to the needs and nutrition of elderly
patients should not be allowed on a team.
The above is an area of importance for
those doing DSME and sometimes they forget about unintentional weight
loss as this increases mortality in elderly patients with diabetes.
The problem of destructive metabolism is sometimes ignored for these
people because acute illness or recent hospitalization is overlooked.
Diet moderation, and if medically able, increased physical activity
should be considered instead of severe caloric restriction, and
should be encouraged in older adults who sincerely wish to lose
weight. The goal for individualized planning needs to minimize
problems in nutrition management and facilitate changes in eating
behaviors. This should be part of the goal to improve clinical
outcomes, improved function, and enhance quality of life.
In the elderly, physical activity assessment can be very difficult and should be done in coordination with their doctor. The elderly can often be at increased risk for sedentary lifestyle. This may be caused by recent acute illnesses, coexisting medical conditions such as chronic pain, no safe environment for physical activity, history of falls, and fear of falling. There are many benefits if the elderly diabetes patients are able to exercise, but they should never be forced to exercise. Limited activity exercises need to be investigated when needed and done with their doctor's knowledge.
In the elderly, physical activity assessment can be very difficult and should be done in coordination with their doctor. The elderly can often be at increased risk for sedentary lifestyle. This may be caused by recent acute illnesses, coexisting medical conditions such as chronic pain, no safe environment for physical activity, history of falls, and fear of falling. There are many benefits if the elderly diabetes patients are able to exercise, but they should never be forced to exercise. Limited activity exercises need to be investigated when needed and done with their doctor's knowledge.
Other chronic diseases and the number
of medications the diabetes patient is taking are important in
evaluating potential limitations for the patient. Polypharmacy is
the use of several or many medications at the same time.
Polypharmacy is always difficult to assess in older patients as many
will not tell you what supplements they are taking because they think
natural cannot be dangerous. With the conflicts between prescription
medications and some supplements, it is important to draw this
information out and get them to talk about them. If nothing more,
list the supplements that can conflict with the medications you learn
they are using.
The fact finding with the elderly can
be problematic. Even if the elderly patient is coming to an office
and has been instructed to bring all medications and supplements,
there is often the doubt that you are seeing all of them. Even for
home visits, medications are often hidden and not brought out.
Therefore, some detective work must be done. Look for medications
from more than one doctor or more than one pharmacy, as this may be a
clue to more medications. Always record all information that is on
the prescription container, Rx number, date filled, directions,
medication name and dosage size, quantity, physician name, refills
remaining, and prescription expiration date. Whether you are an
educator, peer-to-peer worker, or a peer mentor, dealing with some
elderly patients can be a delicate situation where even the best
diplomacy may not yield the discovery of all prescriptions and
supplements in use.
All conflicts in medication must be
reported to the doctor as well as discrepancies like out of date
medications, medications not refilled, especially other doctors and
pharmacies discovered. Always be on the lookout for duplication of
medications and medications that may conflict with other medications.
An additional assessment needs to be
done to evaluate patients and their cognitive abilities to understand
when medications need to be taken. Look for signs of depression and
physical disabilities that may interfere with medication adherence.
This can be very important for the elderly with diabetes and using
insulin. Pens may become more important than syringes in many cases
and in some instances, it may be necessary to suggest or recommend
full care facilities.
Based on the discussion above,
consider the following practical pointers for DSME in older adults
found to have functional limitations:
1. Choose equipment that is easy to hold and easy to use.
2. When possible, simplify the self-care regimen.
3. Conduct education sessions at a slow pace, with instruction
occurring in steps. Use educational material that is easy to follow
and excludes extraneous information. Schedule multiple
sessions, if necessary, to prevent information overload.
4. Provide individual rather than group education.
5. Recommend further evaluation and treatment of depression and
cognitive dysfunction before making any diabetes treatment regimen
changes.
6. Use memory aids (e.g., personalized handouts) to reinforce
points made during face-to-face sessions.
7. Make sure patients understand how to identify hypoglycemia and
when to call the provider.
8. Make every effort to minimize the complexity of meal planning
and to engage the patient's spouse or others living with the patient
in creating a home environment that supports positive dietary change.
9. Prescribe weight loss diets with great caution.
To be continued in part 2.
No comments:
Post a Comment