No, this is not an April fools joke.
Not going to admit it are you? I can just about guess that at
sometime, one of my readers has done this on the sly. And, I don't
blame you for not saying anything because of fear of retaliation.
This blog is from an idea I read in the Health Care Blog. The author
states that the doctor name is fictitious, but the article is based
on data from an online discussion from the UK Consumer Action Group.
The blog originally appeared in the British Medical Journal.
Would I do this? I am seriously
considering it and may at some time in the future. I have a great
miniature digital recorder that has excellent sound pickup qualities
that I have used for other activities, but had not really thought
about recording the conversation in the doctor's office.
The blog was very enlightening about
the reactions from a doctor's point of view and how this is playing
out in the period following the posting. The comments to the blog in Health Care are also very
revealing and this came to light. Carecoach is already providing a
service to record the conversation in a doctor's office.
From a purely legal perspective, I have
not found a reference to confirm several comments about the legal
requirements varying among the different states. Would we need a
signed waiver? Would we need to have just a verbal consent? The
above link may have the answers, but you would need to contact them.
This link may answer a few questions, but does not have a state
specific discussion. My answer is when in doubt – don't record.
I could see a few advantages and a few
disadvantages. It would be a huge advantage for patients that have a
difficult time concentrating and by reviewing what they were told
could prevent mistakes on their part. It could also be used to
prevent them from saying the doctor never told them something.
When you asked the doctor a question,
you would know if you received an answer and not have to rely on
memory. You would also know when a doctor only partially answered a
question. When you know that a doctor answered a question, you could
review the answer to make sure you did not miss something important.
Many people are nervous when they are in
the doctor's exam room. They often do not understand something they
were instructed to do. I also know a friend that has his wife
accompany him on doctor visits. He hears one thing and his wife
hears another. And they do have some heated discussions afterward.
A recording could settle these disagreements.
Okay, but you say what about
doctor-patient trust? Yes, if approached in an unfriendly manner, I
can understand a doctor becoming upset. Even if you explain that you
have missed things in the past and are having memory problems, some
doctors will still become hostile.
I am aware of one doctor that does
record his time with some patients. He knows that they have memory
problems and does this as a way of providing them a recording for
them to review. He does make sure that they have the equipment to
listen to the recording. He even makes a duplicate for himself to
play if the patient calls and does not understand something.
There are many pros and cons, but this
may have its uses.
No comments:
Post a Comment