This is a shock, but makes common
sense. The title used is, “Access to Glucose
Monitoring Supplies Linked to Mortality Rates.” Yes,
those that can obtain sufficient test strips live longer. This is
another reason for taking every advantage possible even if the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Veterans
Administration (VA) don't like it as shown in my blog here.
Even the American Diabetes Association
and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE)
don't think people with type 2 diabetes need to test and want us to
rely on the A1C two or four times a year. That is why this was such
a shock to have this come out during the AACE meeting in Nashville,
TN during the 24th Annual Scientific & Clinical Congress.
The researchers conducted an analysis
of the importance of Medicare patients with diabetes having the
proper supply of blood glucose monitoring tools (test strips). They
found higher death rates among patients who received fewer supplies
than the prior year. Then found lower death rates among patients who
received more supplies than the year prior.
Study author Jaime Davidson, MD, who is
the President of Endocrine and Diabetes Associates of Texas and is
also a clinical professor of medicine at the University of Texas
Southwestern Medical School in Dallas stated that safeguards must be
put in place to monitor changes in the acquisition and to ensure
patient lives are not being put at risk.
Davidson and his colleagues
investigated the potential disruption of patent access to blood
glucose monitoring supplies and its impact on health outcome after
the recent implementation of the CMS competitive bidding program.
Then the researchers assessed to impact of full acquisition of blood
glucose testing supplies compared with partial acquisition on death
among insulin-treated Medicare patients. The researchers defined
full self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) acquisition as greater than
80 test strips covered, based on three test strips used per day.
The researchers found that 71.1% of the
beneficiaries were treated with rapid-acting insulin, including
analog pre-mix, and 20.4% with rapid-acting and long-acting insulin,
including analog, recombinant human pre-mix. They reported that
4-year survival was negatively associated with partial or no SMBG
acquisition in both groups.
The mortality rates were higher among
beneficiaries with full SMBG acquisition in
2010 who migrated to partial SMBG
acquisition or no SMBG record the next year compared with maintaining
full SMBG acquisition.
However, the mortality rates were lower
among beneficiaries with partial SMBG acquisition or no SMBG record
in 2010 but migrated to full SMBG acquisition the next year,
according to the researchers.
Davidson stated, “As a physician,
I'm concerned that CMS did not report any changes in acquisition of
SMBG supplies in their initial report of the competitive bidding
program. We're continuing to look at the data to understand more
about the full impact, but at this stage, given that acquisition of
blood glucose monitoring supplies is indicative of actual blood
glucose monitoring, anything that disrupts acquisition has a very
strong potential to impact patient safety.”
No comments:
Post a Comment