Many people are concerned about the
side effects of oral diabetes drugs. We have been hearing a lot
about them recently and some of the drugs may be dangerous for some
people while other people have little or no lasting effects. This I
think has to do with the individual and the dosage they are taking.
Am I personally concerned? No, and only because I am on insulin and
metformin.
I am concerned about my fellow people
with type 2 diabetes that are using oral diabetes drugs, and I think
rightfully so. I have had blogs in this year pointing out the
dangers of the sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors,
and so far, I have passed on the new seventh class of oral drugs,
canagliflozin, because it is so new. The FDA has ordered more trials
and is studying it further even though it has been approved.
Dr. Peter C. Butler is the chairman of
endocrinology at the University of California, Los Angeles. Dr.
Butler is the lone doctor fighting Big Pharma and their big guns
inside the American Diabetes Association (ADA). Based on his latest study, both the Food and Drug Administration and the European
Medicines Agency have begun investigations that could lead to new
warnings on the drugs or even to their removal from the market.
““The data are inconclusive,”
said Dr. Robert Ratner, chief scientific and medical officer of the
American Diabetes Association. He said even if there were some
excess risk, it would be “exceptionally low.”” This is the
same Dr. Robert Ratner, chief scientific and medical officer for the
ADA that says, “Many
people with type 2 diabetes who are on medications don't need to do
home glucose monitoring at all," Therefore I have a
hard time considering him reliable as he is one pushing oral
medications and he will criticize anyone creating doubt.
Whether you believe Dr. Butler, you
need to read some of the information in the above link.
Considering that the majority of type 2 patients are over 50, when he
discovers something that raises red flags, he should be listened to
and heeded. “Dr. Butler said that after his group presented its
rat findings to Merck, “I never heard from them again,” except
from company lawyers asking when the study would be published.”
“He said that studies done by the drug companies that led to the
drugs’ approval by the F.D.A. tended to use young healthy animals
that would not be expected to get pancreatic cancer.”
This in a big way pulls the curtains
back on how Big Pharma does their research and why they have good
results.
No comments:
Post a Comment