This is an interesting conundrum for
the FDA. Or at least it will be if they lift the restrictions on
Avandia. Avandia is in the class of oral diabetes drugs Thiazolidinedione. Avandia and Actos are the only two drugs in this
class. Avandia is the product of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Actos is
manufactured by Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Avandia is known for causing
heart problems and Actos has a raised incidence of bladder cancer.
If restrictions are lifted on Avandia, will we find out that it too
will raise the incidence of bladder cancer?
Although the big guns on both sides of
the argument are not being quiet, I can well imagine that if the FDA
lifts the ban on Avandia, the FDA will have to weather the storm of
being accused of being too chummy with Big Pharma. Even I would be
remiss in not considering this charge. All too often, I feel that when
there are questionable trials and data, FDA approves a drug when it
should require additional studies.
While it is true that most drugs have
side effects of some type, in the last decades, too many drugs have
made it to market and later had to be removed because of either
something that was kept from the FDA, or something overlooked by the
FDA. I will pull no favoritism because I feel that Big Pharma is
laughing up its sleeve and saying to the FDA, "heads, I win, tails,
you lose." Then on the other side, we have the patients screaming at
the FDA for its slowness of approval for drugs they feel would help
their disease.
If those of us with diabetes did not
have insulin available, then I could possibly understand the need for
oral medications with dangerous side effects. I am not in favor of
this because too many in my generation and the next generation are
pill poppers and if they have an illness or in this case a chronic
disease, all they want is a pill to pop in their mouth and go on with
life. Is it any wonder that diabetes becomes progressive for many
people? They won't learn how to manage diabetes and many won't learn
because they have that pill to take.
For those that have not followed the
Avandia debate, this is where it started for me and now that the
two-day session is in progress (June 5 and June 6), it will be
interesting to read about the outcome. The second article is here by
Dr. Matthew Mintz. The latest article is from the digital side of
the New York Times and you may read it here.
Now, this evening (June 5) there are two more articles that could make an excellent read. Before reading this blog by Dr. Mintz, but sure to read the one above. The second is an article in Forbes dot com.
No comments:
Post a Comment