The last few weeks were somewhat of a blur
for me. I was still upset that I could have caused the group to
fracture in different directions, which fortunately it did not. I
received an invitation to the new group which I politely refused and
then pressure to join their group. Since I had politely refused, I
did not feel bad about shutting off my cell phone and deleting their
emails. It was more difficult avoiding them entirely so I finally
asked them to stop, as I would be staying with the group.
For the number of people in our local
community with diabetes, both types, and now one with LADA, more that
two groups does seem to have a place. This is very good in a way.
Plus this puts doctors serving members of our community on notice
that they need to become more familiar with diabetes and follow
guidelines that are more current. Our group has been approached by
the local doctor of the doctor led group about why we are staying
outside of the official channels. We did ask the doctor advisor why
he opposed our group so vocally and he refused to answer. We clearly
told him that we liked being able to read the guidelines of the
different medical groups and compare them without worry and that all of us
did not wish to be dictated to by other professionals. We did not
wish to follow their teachings when we were able to discern for
ourselves what worked for us.
When he asked to address our group,
emails were rapid and everyone said no. We asked him what the lowest
A1c was for his group. He admitted he did not know and we stated
that our group had several just above 5.5% and one at 5.2% with the
highest one at 6.3%. The doctor said he doubted many of his group
was near 6.0% and we said that was the reason most of us would not
join his group and that of the 14 current members, 12 were now on
insulin. We felt that with this, we would have little in common with
the group he led. He agreed that he had not realized so many of us
were on insulin, and that the two groups were probably better being
separated since we were doing so well on our own.
He did ask if we as a group were having
many problems with hypoglycemia. I asked what level he considered us
to be in hypoglycemia. The doctor said anything under 80 mg/dl. At
this point, the three of us meeting with him laughed and asked if he
was aware of the joint group from ADA and The Endocrine Society that
declared hypoglycemia at 70 mg/dl and he was not. Tim opened his
laptop and this link. He quickly skimmed the article, asked Tim to
send him the link, and gave Tim his email address. I answered that
most of us did not get too concerned with readings down to 60 mg/dl,
but that once it went below 65 mg/dl, we were taking actions to
correct the levels, with either glucose tablets or certain foods or
drinks from this list. Tim then opened my blog about the diabetes algorithm and the doctor asked for that link.
The doctor finally admitted that we
probably knew more than many of his group ever would and thanked us
for letting him know that as a group we did so much research. We
thanked him and told him that someone from our group was always
available to speak to his group about insulin and the advantages of
insulin over oral medications. He said that he would honestly keep
this in mind.
The doctor asked about the two members
of our group that were not on insulin and we stated that one had just
been diagnosed with prediabetes and was taking metformin ER presently
and his wife had type 2 diabetes. She had been encouraged to develop
lifestyle habits that got her off all medications and had been for
some time now. We said that we are working with him to get off all
medications and he is hoping that he can delay diabetes for many
years. He was surprised and said that we did not encourage either to
go on insulin. Tim said no, as we do with all members, but we
discourage anyone from staying on most oral medications other than
metformin because of the side effects and problems many are causing.
I gave him the classes of oral
medications, those that were under close watch by the FDA and asked
him which were acceptable now. He listed them and I said that two of our
group was allergic to sulfa and therefore the sulfonylureas were out
for them. The remaining class required close monitoring because only
glucose tablets were recommended for treating lows because they
slowed foods going through the stomach. At that point, the doctor
stated that as long as we were teaching each other this information
and knew what we did, he was happy that there were two groups. We
corrected him that there were now three groups and the third one was as a
result of our group splitting. They were all on oral medications and
had come from the doctor that did not want his people testing. He
made no comments about this, but we could tell this upset him as
well.
He thanked us for our time and wished
us success. He then stated that he would consider asking us to speak
about insulin in the future since we were well versed about it and
were meeting as a group. He admitted he had not realized we were so
many in number, but that was a good thing. I told him that five of
us were using the VA for our medications and this brought him back.
He said he thought two of the group he led were or should get their
medications from the VA. I quickly told him to have them go to the
VA office at the Courthouse lower level and talk to the VA officer
and she could get them started if they qualified. He said that maybe
he should stay in contact with us and meet with a few of us on a
quarterly or semiannual basis. He stated he had learned more than he
anticipated and anything that could help his group was welcomed.
After he had left, Allen stated he was
surprised we had said so much. Tim stated that he had thought about
it and decided that we should and see where it went. He said that
with so many opposed to him speaking to our group, we needed to sound
him out and exchange ideas. I said it may now be a good thing to
have him speak to our group since he knows that so many of us are on
insulin and that he was not welcome in his first attempt. Tim said
that was also his reason for discussing so much with him and by
having his laptop available, we should have impressed him with our
knowledge and research. This also let him know why our members were
not interested in joining his group.
Tim concluded that he would press him
to have as least two of our group address his group and since we now
had his email address, he would attempt to stay in contact with him.
I told Tim that I agreed and like it or not, we should consider
having him as a speaker in the near future. Allen was hesitant,
but said he would think about it. He did admit being surprised about
his reaction to so many of us being on insulin. I said this would
not be something he would want for his group since all were on oral
medications. Tim said that was the dividing line and this was a good
thing. With that we went our separate ways for the day.
No comments:
Post a Comment