What are reasonable goals for a person
with type 2 diabetes? This is a topic that has bothered me for the
last few months. In out informal peer-to-peer group, we all have
different goals and most seem satisfied with their goals. Do we
always achieve our goals? Not even close to all of us achieve our
goals every time we see our doctor, but for the most part, as a group
we don't miss by a lot. While the average age varies every time we
add to the group, the majority are now over the age of 65. However,
this does not establish goals for anyone.
The first thing I want to emphasize is
that there are no standard answers or rules. We all strive to
maintain certain limits that we can live with or tolerate. We all
agree to attempt to keep our A1c's under 6.5% and lower if possible.
We have all stated that we need to keep our lipid levels in range, if
possible, but we seldom discuss this part of our lives. We have also
agreed that our goals are ours and not for anyone else to follow. It
happens that several of us have very similar goals and we probably
talk about this more than the rest. At present, none of us is
limited cognitively and this is something we have agreed among
ourselves to maintain a link to watch for any cognitive problems.
Diabetes and cognition are two of the factors that have bound us more
tightly as a group because we care about each other as individuals.
Even as individuals, it has been
enlightening to how we set our goals. With the current number of ten
members and nine of us being on insulin, there is quite a bit of
similarity among us. Sue is still off all medications and she is
happy that we support her with her goals. She wants to keep her A1c
as close to 5.5% or under if possible. Even her husband is surprised
at her success as her last A1c was 5.2%. She is the youngster in our
group and we do tease her about this. She replies that if the old
fogies would learn from her, we could be a lot healthier.
With the A1c range for people without
diabetes (normal range) according the Joslin's Diabetes Deskbook
being from 4.0% to 6.0%, we have to remember that prediabetes is
defined from 5.7% to 6.4%. Prediabetes is another topic that many
wish would be labeled as diabetes. Because A1c values do vary
quarterly, some are advocating that we should check the A1c values
monthly. For more information on this, please read this blog by
David Mendosa.
With this in mind, here are some goals
for people to look at as possible goals they should consider as their
own. Therefore, select realistic goals and work toward them. Of the nine members on insulin, our
A1cs range from 5.5% to 6.5%. as of the latest A1c values. Some of
us have the same A1c and don't get too concerned since this should be
expected. Max and I are the only two that occasionally exceed 6.5%
and then we have to work very diligently to make sure we get below
6.5% on the next A1c.
We are all careful to avoid
hypoglycemia and three of the individuals have never had
hypoglycemia. Since I have been on insulin the longest, by about two
years, I have had the most incidents of this, but never one that I
was not aware of or prepared to correct. On several occasions, I
knew as soon as I put down the syringe that I was going to need to be
aware of and prevent this from happening. On two occasions, I
accidentally injected my short-term insulin in the same area as the
long-term injection. I stayed up late both nights and fortunately
had enough test strips and glucose tablets to stay out of trouble and
only get to the lower 60's for blood glucose levels.
I have had eight readings below 65
mg/dl in the nine years on insulin and the next is only five readings
below 65. Then the numbers go to three and two. Why do we choose 65
for our hypoglycemia? Because we can and in general we do not get
below 70 mg/dl. Several of the group try to constantly remain under
125 mg/dl and above 80 mg/dl and have been very successful at it.
We are all fortunate to have the test
strips we need or be able to afford more if insurance limits us.
Five of us do obtain our diabetes supplies and medications from the
veteran’s administration (VA) and are thankful for that. Our
testing supplies are very much what we need and we make use of them.
We are now over a month into 2013 and
have now added three additional members that are very happy to have
us helping them. Brenda and Sue are probably the most pleased, as
two of them are women and are happy to have others to talk with. All
three are presently on oral medications, which is also revealing. In
our first meeting, with three of the group absent for work, the ones
new to the group were very curious as to why so many of us were on
insulin. Brenda was happy to say “Greater ease of management.”
This of course became our discussion for that meeting. The A1cs for
the new members was 6.6% to 7.0% and they were surprised at our A1cs
of all being 6.5% or less. Many questions were answered about multiple
daily injections and testing. The three were surprised at our
relaxed attitude about this and that fact that most of us did not
think anything about the extra testing and multiple injections.
They were all surprised that we used
our arms and different parts of our bodies for injecting insulin.
They were very interested in why and Brenda was happy to answer that
we needed to prevent insulin absorption and utilization problems and
avoid creating scar tissue under our skin. This in turn would affect
the insulin utilization and cause insulin waste if scar tissue caused
the insulin not to disperse from the injection site. Some may
escape, but not the full amount injected.
Then the question was asked about
alternate site testing. We all stated that we used our fingers and
not alternate sites because we wanted the “now” reading for
accurate correction data and needed to know this. If we were going
up or down was also mentioned. Then Tim said that for those on oral
medications other than sulfonylureas, alternate site testing would
work if their readings were fairly consistent. Brenda advised them
to be careful if their readings were still fluctuating up and down
since they were new to testing. Two were on metformin and one on a
sulfonylurea and metformin. All three said their doctors had advised
them against alternate site testing for now, but that they were happy
that we were willing to talk about this.
Allen then said that they would all be
wise to read about and understand insulin, but there was no hurry
since so many of us were on insulin. Then he asked how long each had
been on metformin. The answer was one year and the other two for
only six and eight months. The two women asked if he was concerned
about vitamin B12 and when Allen said yes and vitamin D, they said
that the diabetes clinic had tested both of them for these and said
both had been advised to add them as supplements. The fellow said he
had also been tested. Then one of the women said they understood his
concern after what had happened to him and he said then you have been
reading Bob's blog. All three admitted they were and Allen said at
least we are all on the same page.
Then we needed to call an end to the
meeting and the three of them wanted to ask more questions. We
allowed one question and they agreed. The fellow asked why I was the
only one blogging. I could see the eyes looking at me, so I spoke
up. I said most are not ready and they do not have the desire that I
have. Ben then said, he agreed as he had thought about it, but even
though he enjoyed the research, he was not ready to write even once a
week. He said that he does send me blog ideas and I agreed and said
several others do as well. Brenda said she has no desire, but enjoys
most of what I write about, but not everything. She also said that
they appreciated that I did not use their real names and had agreed
that I could use a made up name to keep people identified.
Since people were anxious to leave, I
told the three, that if they had any interest, to please contact me
and I would tell them what I could. Two have and are especially
looking for other resources and a few other bloggers to read. The
one has been reading from the blogger list I maintain and I have sent
both other bloggers from the type 1 bloggers and others.
No comments:
Post a Comment