Two articles both cite the 1996-2007
Health and Retirement Study to identify individuals with a diagnosis
of peripheral neuropathy. They focused on 15 relevant tests and
examined the number and patterns of tests six months before and after
the initial diagnosis.
What the two articles concentrate on is
holding up the expensive MRIs that many doctors order which is less
than definitive for diagnosis. Then they make a leap that does upset
me. They assume that most everyone with neuropathy has diabetes and
declare that the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) be performed
instead. The OGTT is cheaper and may be a solution, but it is far
from the most reliable as well when done by itself.
What are they going to do next when the
patient does not have diabetes? I have a hard time understanding
researchers that assume neuropathy means you have diabetes. There
are other causes of neuropathy and the researchers focused on 15
relevant tests. They may mention them in the full study report, but
the press release just focuses on MRIs and OGTT.
I must have been fortunate as four
tests were used to determine that I had neuropathy and MRI and OGTT
were not among them. I was diagnosed several years prior to the
diagnosis of diabetes. The neurologist also did a thorough
examination of my feet, hands, and lower legs. Then he did the tests
before stating that I had peripheral neuropathy.
We do need to use tests for neuropathy
that are definitive and not just the expensive tests. Therefore, the
researchers are pointing out a real problem we have in our medical
system.
No comments:
Post a Comment