Normally, I would not take a topic from the NY Times. However, since this is one of the better articles on
polypharmacy, and covers the topic quite well, I will use it.
About one-third of adverse events in
hospitalizations include a drug-related harm, leading to longer
hospital stays and greater expense. The Institute of Medicine
estimated that there are 400,000 preventable adverse drug events in
hospitals each year, costing $3.5 billion. One-fifth of patients
discharged from the hospital have a drug-related complication after
returning home, many of which are preventable.
The above statement is very powerful,
but most hospital administrators care less as long as they make their
bonus. Many hospitalists send patients home on the same or more
pills than they prescribed for them while in the hospital.
The vast majority of higher-quality
studies summarized in a systematic review on polypharmacy — the
taking of multiple medications — found an association with a bad
health event, like a fall, hospitalization or death.
Not every adverse drug event means a
patient has been prescribed an unnecessary and harmful drug. But,
older patients are at greater risk because they tend to have more
chronic conditions and take a multiplicity of medications for them.
Two-thirds of Medicare beneficiaries have two or more chronic
conditions, and almost half take five or more medications. Over a
year, almost 20 percent take 10 or more drugs or supplements.
Some drugs are unnecessary. At least
one in five older patients are on an inappropriate medication — one
that they can do without or that can be switched to a different,
safer drug. One study found that 44 percent of frail, older patients
were prescribed at least one drug unnecessarily. A study of over
200,000 older veterans with diabetes found that over half were
candidates for dropping a blood pressure or blood sugar control
medication. Some studies cite even higher numbers — 60 percent of
older Americans may be on a drug they don’t need.
Though
studies have found a correlation between the number of drugs a
patient takes and the risk of an adverse event, the problem may not
be the number of drugs, but the wrong ones. Some medications have
been identified as more likely to contribute to adverse events,
particularly for older patients.
For example, if you’re taking
psychotropic agents, such as benzodiazepines or sleep-aid drugs, you
may be at increased risk of falling and cognitive impairment.
Diuretics and antihypertensives have also been identified as
potentially problematic. (The Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality has published a longer list of drugs that are potentially
inappropriate for older patients. Note that, even if they are
problematic for some patients, they are appropriate for many.)
Relative to the mountain of evidence on
the effects of taking prescription drugs, there are very few clinical
trials on the effects of not taking them.
Among
them is one randomized trial that found that careful evaluation and
weekly management of medications taken by older patients reduced
unnecessary or inappropriate drug use. Adverse drug reactions fell
by 35 percent. Medication use was reduced, along with the risk of
falls among a group of older, community-dwelling patients through a
program that included a review of medications.
Several other studies also found that
withdrawal of psychotropic medications reduced falls. A
comprehensive review of deprescribing studies found that some
approaches to it could reduce the risk of death. Another recent
randomized trial found that frail and older people could drop an
average of two drugs from a 10-drug regimen with no adverse effects.
So why
isn’t deprescribing more widely considered? According to a
systematic review of research on the question, some physicians are
not aware that they’re prescribing inappropriately. Other doctors
may have difficulty identifying which drugs are inappropriate, in
part because of lack of evidence. In other cases, doctors believe
that adverse effects of drug interactions are outweighed by benefits.
The above paragraph shows the problems
that doctors have and the possible influence of Big Pharma on their
prescribing habits. Unfortunately the following paragraph is also
true and adds to the problems.
Physicians
also report that some patients resist changing medications, fearing
that alternatives — including lifestyle changes — will not be as
effective. Other studies found that many doctors are concerned about
liability if something should go wrong or worry they’ll fail to
meet performance benchmarks — like the proportion of diabetic
patients with adequate blood sugar control.
To
reduce the chances of problems with medications, experts advocate
that physicians more routinely review the medication regimens of
their patients, particularly those with many prescriptions. At
hospital discharge — when patients leave the hospital, often on
more medications than when they entered it — is a particularly
important time for such a review. Including nurses and pharmacists
in the process can reduce the burden on physicians and the risks to
patients.
Patients can play an important role as
well. Walid Gellad, a physician in the Veterans Health
Administration and at the University of Pittsburgh School of
Medicine, advises that at every visit with a doctor, “patients
should ask, ‘Are there any medications that I am on that I don’t
need anymore, or that I could try going without?’ ”
Patients, of course, should not try
weaning themselves off medication without consulting their doctors —
but deprescribing is an idea for all parties to keep in mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment