A study of 250 million people in four countries found that patients with diabetes, hypertension, and
depression often receive significantly different treatment depending
on where they live.
Eleven groups of researchers used
records from the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics
program, establishing methods of equalizing the varying methods of
collection and storing patient information to make the data usable
for larger future studies.
The OHDSI contains more than 600
million patient records from 14 countries, including electronic
health records, insurance claims and pharmacy records. The OHDSI is
coordinated by researchers at Columbia University. The researchers
hope the collection of data will allow for better design of clinical
trials and treatment methods. The international project is aimed at
gleaning insight into how people are treated, with the hope of
providing more personalized and effective healthcare based on what
works in the real world, as opposed to randomized clinical trials.
"The creation of such a network
is a great opportunity, not only to characterize what treatments are
actually being used, but also to attempt to identify what treatments
are potentially better," Dr. Nigam Shah, an associate
professor of medicine at Stanford University, said in a press
release. "For example, from the wide variation in
second-line treatments for diabetes, we can attempt to identify those
that are more effective. OHDSI puts us on a path to creating
personalized evidence, which is a form of precision medicine."
For the study, published in the
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers
analyzed data on 250 million people in four countries receiving
treatment for diabetes, hypertension and depression.
Among patients with diabetes, most are
initially treated with the drug metformin, though secondary
treatments vary significantly between patients. In hypertension and
depression, initial treatments vary even more.
The researchers also found 10 percent
of diabetes patients, 11 percent of depression patients and 24
percent of hypertension patients received paths of treatment
different from all other patients whose records were analyzed in the
study.
"We found that while the world
is moving toward more consistent therapy over time for the three
diseases, there remain significant differences in how they are
treated," said Dr. George Hripcsak, chair of biomedical
informatics at Columbia University Medical Center and principal
investigator of the OHDSI coordinating center. "This
suggests that randomized clinical trials -- the gold standard in
evaluating new therapies -- may not capture enough of the information
needed to make their results more broadly generalizable to different
populations."
No comments:
Post a Comment