We have learned that preventing diabetes through lifestyle interventions is possible. This has been
consistently reported in other clinical trials. While this is
somewhat less effective in the real world, even translational studies
of combined diet and physical activity programs have shown reduced
diabetes risk. We are talking about people with
pre-diabetes.
These programs are cost-effective and
relatively inexpensive, especially when delivered in a group format,
with a median cost per participant of less than $500. Unfortunately, no cost-benefit studies
were identified, so we do not know how much of a long-term impact
diabetes prevention may have on healthcare costs.
However, given that patients with
diabetes incur medical expenditures that are more than twice as high
as those of patients without diabetes, simple logic suggests that the
impact could be substantial, even when considering that costs for
people with pre-diabetes are already elevated. The biggest problem
is we do not know the extent to which evidence-based
diet-and-exercise diabetes prevention programs are being offered.
Although somewhat less effective than
lifestyle, metformin has been shown to prevent diabetes in clinical
trials. Metformin has been shown to be a cost-saving intervention
and is clearly easier to deliver on a population-wide basis than diet
and exercise programs. In patients with newly diagnosed diabetes,
metformin is most effective when given at diagnosis and at lower A1c
levels than if delayed, suggesting that beginning metformin before
diabetes develops may further enhance its effectiveness.
Despite this evidence, and even though
metformin is included in the American Diabetes Association guideline
for diabetes prevention, only a small minority of patients at risk
for diabetes are receiving metformin. If a relatively simple and
inexpensive intervention is reaching less than 5% of its target
population, we can imagine that a more complex and costly
intervention will not fare any better. Of interest, the 5% treatment
rate is actually an improvement over a previous study based on
2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, in
which no patients with pre-diabetes were receiving metformin and only
about one third had received advice about diet and exercise.
We know that type 2 diabetes is a major
public health crisis and we know that it can be prevented. The
Community Preventive Services Task Force has just issued a
recommendation for promotion of combined diet and physical activity
programs by healthcare systems, communities, and other implementers.
For those unwilling or unable to participate, metformin offers a
simple, low-cost, and effective alternative. What are doctors
waiting for?
I am only guessing, but I feel that
many doctors are not interested in treating pre-diabetes. I have
heard doctors laugh about pre-diabetes and say they would not treat
these people until they had something treatable. One doctor and I
had a heated discussion about this in a hospital cafeteria until two
other doctors ushered him away and one came back to ask me to leave
and was none to polite about it. As I was leaving, I asked why it
was that some doctors like to do harm to patients.
No comments:
Post a Comment