The introduction to this article is not
a good indicator of what is happening and it should not garner the
readership it is receiving. It should not make people with diabetes
feel confident either. The title is very misleading as it only
mentions diabetes when it should also mention the three measures or
health issues they were discussing. They are talking about blood
glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol levels.
All three of the sources I found
actually mislabeled the article. Two said diabetes and the third
source – Medscape – listed it as diabetes risk factor. I fail to
see how diabetes risk factor is involved when a person already has
diabetes. Granted using the term diabetes probably brings more
readers like it did me, but this is promoting the wrong assumption
about the article and they don't mention the three issues until the
second paragraph.
Yes, we all need to be concerned about
the three issues as they are interrelated and one can affect the
other two to a point. However, what bothers me is that they don't
give this interrelation, but they say that two decades, yes, two
decades ago, the rate of people with any type to diabetes meeting or
exceeding the three measures of good diabetes management was only two
percent. Now 20 years later the number has risen to only 19 percent.
Shame on the ADA and the rest of the medical establishment for this
lack of progress.
They then claim this is a huge
improvement and don't even give the numbers of people with diabetes
in 1988 and the number of people in 2010. The begs the question of
how are they relating the numbers to claim this is a huge
improvement. Dr. Joel Zonszein, director of the Clinical Diabetes
Center at Montefiore Medical Center in New York City, not
participating in the study expresses my feelings. He says that with
the increased awareness of diabetes and many newer medications, it is
disappointing that only 19 percent meet all three measures.
Zonszein also states something that is
upsetting for many - 100 percent of people with diabetes should be on
statins - because only 50 percent were on statins. He also said that
the 50 percent of the people not having the recommended levels of
blood pressure should be on drugs for that. That is right – he
wants to shove pills at people rather than see if other means might
help first – typical medical response.
Then as if rubbing salt into the wound
the article states that is it important to keep these measures as
close to the “recommended” goals as possible. The article says
this will avoid serious complications like heart disease, kidney
failure, and vision problems. They quote of the ADA recommendation
for A1c as being 7.0 percent as if this will prevent complications.
I'm sorry to say that this may only slow the rate complications and
allow diabetes to progress, but this is not a goal. We want to stop
complications and prevent progression. Even though the
recommendation by the American Association of Clinical
Endocrinologists (AACE) of 6.5 percent is not ideal, but much better
even for the elderly.
Even though Zonszein is abrupt and
seems to lack compassion in his statements, he does raise a few good
points. He states that young people developing type 2 diabetes seem
to have a particularly aggressive form of the disease. They seem to
respond less to insulin and are more insulin resistant. He does
state that education is the key for all people with diabetes. Where
he gets this is a puzzle. He says that presently people often don't
get education until late in the disease. This may have been
partially true two decades ago, but today with the internet; more
people are getting education earlier. Whether they apply the
education is the question.
Fortunately, with the internet, his
next point is where many people draw the line. He says that people
need the education to know what is going on so that you will take the
medications. He claims that when you are not feeling sick, it is
difficult to take the pills. He may be partially correct, but young
people of today use the internet to look up the different “pills”
and find the side effects and purpose of medications.
I agree with Zonszein that this paper
is an alarm, but only because our medical community is doing so
little to educate people and bring diabetes under better management.
No comments:
Post a Comment