The American Diabetes Association is
very subtle in their discussion when it comes to prevention or delay
of type 2 diabetes. Only where they need to, do they use the term
prediabetes. Instead they prefer to use the term elevated risk for
type 2 diabetes. To be on the same page requires some definition.
“In 1997 and 2003, the Expert Committee on
Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus recognized an
intermediate group of individuals whose glucose levels do not meet
criteria for diabetes, yet are higher than those considered normal.”
This is a reasonable definition, and a
little further into the definition they say, Individuals with IFG
(impaired fasting glucose) and/or IGT (impaired glucose testing) have
been referred to as having prediabetes. The 2003 ADA Expert
Committee report reduced the lower FPG (fasting plasma glucose) cut
point to define IFG from 110 mg/dl (6.1 mmol/l) to 100 mg/dl (5.6
mmol/l). The World Health Organization (WHO) and many other diabetes
organizations did not adopt this change in the definition of IFG.
People with IFG and IGT often have
other cardiovascular risk factors, such as obesity, hypertension, and
dyslipidemia. Assessing and treating these risk factors is an
important aspect of reducing cardiometabolic risk. IFG and IGT are
associated with obesity (especially abdominal or visceral obesity),
dyslipidemia (a condition marked by abnormal concentrations of lipids
or lipoproteins in the blood) with high triglycerides and/or low HDL
cholesterol, and hypertension.
Individuals with an A1C of 5.7–6.4%
should be counseled about their increased risk for diabetes as well
as cardiovascular disease and counseled about effective strategies,
such as weight loss and physical activity, to lower their risks. As
with glucose measurements, the continuum of risk is curvilinear, so
that as A1C rises, the risk of type 2 diabetes rises
disproportionately. Interventions should be most intensive and
follow-up should be particularly vigilant for those with A1C levels
above 6.0%, who should be considered to be at very high risk. They
emphasize that just as an individual with a fasting glucose of 98
mg/dl (5.4 mmol/l) may not be at negligible risk for diabetes,
individuals with A1C levels below 5.7% may still be at risk,
depending on level of A1C and presence of other risk factors, such as
obesity and family history.
The experts have carefully tied
diabetes to cardiovascular risks to promote the use of statins,
though they don't say as much. It is a fact that the two are closely
related and must be considered together, but with changes in
lifestyle, both diabetes and cardiovascular risks may both be
reduced. This means weight loss, exercise,stopping smoking,
and other poor health habits.
Table 2 in this section describes the
categories of increased risk for diabetes.
|
|
|
For all three tests, risk is
continuous, extending below the lower limit of the range and becoming
disproportionately greater at higher ends of the range.
No comments:
Post a Comment