If you agree that newly diagnosed
patients do not always receive advice on managing their diabetes,
including testing information read my blogs here and here. Then you
need to wonder if patients are receiving the correct diagnosis. The
disturbing factor is the misdiagnosed patients are not reported to
any database. Often it is the patient, the doctor, and maybe a few
family members that ever know about the misdiagnosis. Yes, the
insurance carrier knows, but they generally will not release any
information. This should be a concern for any newly diagnosed
patient. The lack of a diabetes database and a database for
improperly diagnosed diabetes patients allows doctors to continue
without problems or even a review by state practice boards.
This is disturbing because this
includes all forms of diabetes, type 1, type 2, LADA, and MODY. No
one can say what the actual numbers are and that is the shame for
people with diabetes. How can we put trust in the medical community
that wants to keep this buried? Until states and the federal
government establish these databases and make reporting mandatory,
this will continue to be a problem. Doctors will have no incentive
to be more careful in their initial diagnosis. These databases will
also need to available for review by diabetes patients to report
incidents of misdiagnosis for confirmation. These databases could
also be valuable for other doctors and diabetes patients to determine
the number of misdiagnosed patients by doctor to discover reasons to
question a diabetes diagnosis by the doctors with large numbers of
these patients.
As I explained here, diabetes diagnosis
is not as cut and dried, as many would think. I talked about many of
the tests in this blog and it never hurts to review them. “Can
the A1c be used initially to screen for diabetes? Some doctors do use
it for screening. Other doctors prefer a fasting blood glucose (FBG),
the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and the A1c before they will
diagnose diabetes. Another test in the diagnosis arsenal is the
fasting plasma glucose (FPG) test. Still other doctors will use other
tests to make sure it is type 2 and not type 1 or LADA. The C-peptide
is also used to determine insulin resistance or the amount of insulin
your body is producing. Levels of autoantibodies to insulin and the
beta cells can be of some value but even these do not lead to an
airtight diagnosis. This is because not all people with type 1 have
these antibodies. Therefore, the diagnosis is still largely a
clinical one.”
I will also refer people to this
website lab tests online dot org for a list of tests used for
diabetes. This has a discussion of - tests for screening, tests for
diagnosis, and tests for monitoring. I would urge people to know the
different tests and what their doctor used for their diagnosis. Not
covered is the tests for maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)
as this is a very specific and sometimes expensive test. Information
on MODY can be found here and the six types of MODY are listed in a
chart near the bottom of the page.
Most cases of misdiagnosis are people
with LADA being initially diagnosed as type 2 diabetes. These are
the majority of cases we hear about, make the evening news, or the
morning papers. This blog on the Joslin blog site is one of the
better discussions about the problems of correct diabetes diagnosis.
The next area of misdiagnosis in MODY
being diagnosed as type 1 diabetes. I have blogged about some of the
problems here and recommend you explore this site. What is even more
of a concern is how some doctors feel about diabetes. I had one
doctor (not one of mine thankfully) make a blanket statement that
diabetes is diabetes and there in one simple treatment – give the
patient insulin. He then continued it does not matter which type of
diabetes the person has – insulin can treat them all. When he was
asked by another person about people not needing medications or that
could get off medication, he said if they had diabetes, all they
needed to do was adjust the amount of insulin they injected. Other
questions were asked, but the doctor was not budging from his
pronouncement.
No comments:
Post a Comment