Another “Expert Group” for diabetes
is not something that gives me a lot of hope. Again, they do not
include any people from the patient side. Granted there are not a
lot of experts these professionals would classify as patient experts.
The name of the program is called
“Improving Quality in Type 2 Diabetes: A national Initiative to
Assess Guideline Adherence and Physician/Pharmacist Coordination.”
This is part of a U.S. multiphase initiative that is setting out to
assess the effects of current in-practice behavior across
multidisciplinary professions in caring for patients with type 2
diabetes. Sounds impressive, but will this really assist patients?
I always get a sickening feeling when I
read things like this as I wonder what other limits are going to be
imposed on those of us with type 2 diabetes. Is this another program
to declare that type 2 patients on oral medications do not need to
spend time testing? Or, will someone finally realize that the
physicians are not doing their duty of educating patients on the
value and meaning of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).
This is always a possibility and should
be high on the priorities for any expert group, but will it? “The
aims of the program are:
- To reveal practice-specific obstacles of appropriate glycemic control in primary care and endocrinology in multiple locations and practice environments across the U.S.
- To assess current pharmacist practices in terms of medication education and patient monitoring of those with type 2 diabetes, and
- To determine the critical factors of successful interdisciplinary diabetes care by considering the behaviors and attitudes of physicians, staff, pharmacists and patients.”
Notice that the only mention of
patients is in the last point above. Everything else is dedicated to
practice level discussion. How will they determine the behaviors and
attitudes of patients? Will this be just another adhering or
non-adhering discussion about the patients? Or, will they actually
consider the feelings and problems patients encounter in lack of
diabetes education, continuing support and updated education, and the
benefits of continuing education to assist the patients?
As a patient, I can only suspect that
it will be more of the same lack of concern for the welfare of the
patient and no thought about the lack of education provided. This will
leave patients out in the cold and the “medical professionals”
patting themselves of the back for again claiming to have improved
life for the patient.
Until the professionals change their
thought process and include patients with type 2 diabetes in any
discussion, nothing will change from a patient perspective. No
education will be provided to the patient, SMBG will continue to be
downgraded, and patients will continue to wonder where to get
reliable information and help in their management of diabetes.
No comments:
Post a Comment