This is one study that goes against
many studies, and being a small study – 163 overweight people
divided into four groups – does not prove what they wanted to
prove. The reason is there are too many variables that are not
accounted for and they pushed conclusions that may not have been
accurately accounted for in the study.
Yes, low glycemic index foods may not
have resulted in greater weight loss, but even in the study details
which I was able to acquire, the low glycemic index foods were not
revealed.
I do not appreciate that even what they
consider healthy foods are not detailed. Some low glycemic foods can
be unhealthy and not telling what low glycemic foods were used is
just as bad as not stating what healthy foods were used.
I could believe that may of the foods
used were from the foods promoted by the USDA and this statement does
call this into question, “In fact, researchers found that
overweight adults placed on a low-GI diet actually showed less
sensitivity to insulin than those on a high-GI diet. Insulin is the
body's key blood-sugar-regulating hormone, and a decline in insulin
sensitivity can eventually lead to type 2 diabetes.”
When a researcher says, "Low-GI
diets are difficult to follow," I can believe this, as they
are not as nutritious as the foods in a higher-GI diet. Then this
statement points to possibly the reason for this research, "If
you don't have to worry about foods' glycemic index, that makes it
easier to follow a healthy diet." Don't get me wrong, the
glycemic index isn't the end-all, but can provide some pointers that
help people avoid diabetes or delay the onset of diabetes.
What annoyed me was that all of the
diets were based on the DASH diet ((Dietary Approaches to Stop
Hypertension) which is supposedly a heart-healthy plan that is built
around fruits and vegetables, fiber-rich grains, 'good fats like
olive oil, fish, and low-fat dairy products. Then they varied the
number of carbohydrates to distinguish the different diets, either 58
percent or 40 percent of daily calories, and finally either high or
low in glycemic index.
The variable was added after five weeks
when the study volunteers were switched to a different diet of the
four diets. By not saying which, the results could have been easily
swayed the way the researchers desired. All of the participants were
required to eat their main meal at the research center and then given
their other meals and snacks to take home.
By not saying which diets and which
they were switched to at the end of the first five weeks, they then
claim the results showed some surprises. They claimed that the
high-carb, high-GI diet had the greatest results in insulin
sensitivity. In contrast, the people's insulin sensitivity barely
changed when they followed the high-carb/low-GI diet, the study
reported. None of the participants had diabetes according to the
researchers.
No comments:
Post a Comment